Plain-English SEO diagnosis
Review titles, meta descriptions, H1/H2 structure, internal links, schema, sitemap status, alt text, speed, and noindex signals.
Partner monthly review
Monthly SEO/AEO review for Partner firms
Partner combines platform evidence, optional approved data, human review, and AI-assisted drafts into a recurring improvement workflow the firm can approve month by month.
Monthly worklist
Human review
Review-ready drafts
Problem and solution
A recurring review should end with work the firm can approve
Partner combines site health, content structure, local and AI-search readiness, approved data, supplied competitor pages, and conversion behavior into a monthly worklist.
Partner gives firms a recurring monthly review of technical, content, local, AI-search, competitor, and conversion signals, followed by practical work the firm can approve and prioritize.
| Technical | Titles, metadata, headings, links, schema, sitemap, robots/noindex, alt text, and speed data. |
|---|---|
| Competitive | Manually supplied competitor page links are compared for page depth, FAQs, local signals, trust, and CTA clarity. |
| Conversion | Visits, CTA clicks, forms, booking starts, completions, source, and device data become page-level recommendations. |
What is included
What's included
- A monthly prioritized worklist tells the firm what deserves attention first.
- Technical and content review turns site findings into specific, reviewable improvements.
- Local and AI-search readiness checks make firm, service, and office information easier to verify.
- Competitor page comparison reveals useful content and consultation-path gaps without copying another firm.
- Conversion recommendations connect visibility work to calls, forms, booking, and follow-up.
- Human-reviewed drafts keep public legal content under firm control before publication.
AI growth layer
AI support that keeps attorneys in control
The platform uses AI to make growth work easier to review: intake context, Legal AI workflows, content drafts, SEO/AEO recommendations, AI-search readiness, competitor comparisons, and conversion ideas. It does not provide legal advice, evaluate case merits, guarantee rankings, or promise placement in AI answers.
AI-search readiness
Review whether pages have clear service context, attorney bios, local signals, FAQs, schema, and sourceable content that AI-assisted search systems can understand.
Competitor comparison
Compare supplied competitor page links for content depth, FAQs, local signals, CTA clarity, booking paths, trust signals, and mobile UX.
Conversion recommendations
Use visits, form starts, booking starts, completions, CTA clicks, source data, and device data to prioritize practical improvements.
Workflow
The Partner monthly review cycle
Collect approved signals
The review uses public site evidence, platform data, optional Search Console and PageSpeed, and supplied competitor pages.
Prioritize with context
Technical, content, local, AI-search, and conversion findings are ordered by practical impact.
Review the drafts
Title, meta, FAQ, internal-link, CTA, and page recommendations stay subject to firm and human review.
Questions attorneys ask
Do you guarantee rankings?
No. The audit gives practical recommendations and drafts for attorney review without promising ranking positions.
Is Google Search Console required?
No, but search query data requires a connection.
Next step
Start with a connected growth system and keep legal content under attorney control
No setup fee, included launch setup, site migration support, and no guaranteed leads. The platform gives the firm the tools to publish, capture, review, and improve from one connected workspace.